FNMA FMCC Deep Dive

The story of Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC), the twin pillars of the U.S. housing market, is a ghost story. It’s the story of the great financial crisis of 2008, a crisis from which these government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) never truly escaped. Placed into conservatorship at the height of the crisis, they have since operated in a state of suspended animation—wildly profitable, yet with their shareholders left out in the cold.

For over a decade, the U.S. Treasury has performed a "Net Worth Sweep," redirecting all of the GSEs' profits, which now total over $30 billion in combined annual income, directly to the government's coffers. This arrangement has turned Fannie and Freddie into cash cows for the Treasury, but it has left their common and preferred shareholders with little more than a claim on a bankrupt company. The shares, once stalwarts of the financial sector, now trade for pocket change, a constant reminder of the "unfinished business" of 2008.

However, the winds of political change are stirring. As of late 2025, the chatter in Washington and on Wall Street has returned to a familiar theme: privatization. The rumors are swirling, talk of a potential $500 billion IPO or "re-IPO" that would finally end the conservatorship and return Fannie and Freddie to the private market. This is the political bull case, a narrative of "political hopium" that suggests a resolution is finally at hand. If the government were to sell its stake, the common stock, currently languishing around $1.50, could re-rate to $10 or more, a life-changing return for those brave enough to hold on.

But this narrative of political salvation is running headlong into a grim economic reality: the credit cycle is turning. After years of "higher for longer" interest rates, the American consumer is starting to break. Delinquency rates are ticking up, and the housing market, once a source of strength, is showing signs of weakness. This is the fundamental bear case, a story of rising defaults and deteriorating credit quality that could threaten the very solvency of the GSEs.

This memo will dissect the central paradox facing investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: a potential 10x return driven by political whim, set against the rising tide of a credit flush. We will analyze the deteriorating housing data, dissect the complex capital structure, and model a potential privatization to determine whether the moonshot of a government exit is worth the risk of a market meltdown.

2. Financial Deep Dive: The "Credit Crack"

The bull case for the GSEs is built on a foundation of political will, but the bear case is built on a foundation of cold, hard data. And right now, that data is telling a worrying story. The "credit crack," the first sign of a downturn in the credit cycle, is starting to appear in the housing market.

The most alarming trend is the uptick in serious delinquencies (90+ days past due). While the numbers are still low by historical standards, the direction of travel is clear. The latest data from Q3 2025 shows the delinquency rate on single-family residential mortgages at 1.78%. This is the canary in the coal mine. It suggests that the most vulnerable borrowers are starting to fall behind on their payments, a classic early warning sign of a broader housing downturn. Is this just a blip, a temporary anomaly in the data? Or is it the beginning of a trend that could look unnervingly like 2007?

Compounding the problem is the slowdown in the Housing Price Index (HPI). The boom years of 2020-2022, when house prices were growing at a double-digit pace, are now a distant memory. The forecast for 2025 is a much more modest 2.5% growth. This is a critical development. When house prices are rising, borrowers who get into trouble can often refinance their way out of it. But when prices flatten, that escape hatch closes. Suddenly, a borrower who loses their job or faces a medical emergency has no easy way to tap into their home equity. This is how a few isolated defaults can quickly snowball into a foreclosure crisis.

The "higher for longer" interest rate environment is the accelerant on this fire. With 30-year mortgage rates stubbornly above 6.19%, the affordability crisis in the housing market is only getting worse. Potential buyers are locked out of the market, and existing homeowners are locked into their low-rate mortgages, creating a stagnant and illiquid market. This is a dangerous cocktail of factors, and it's one that could have serious consequences for the GSEs, which sit at the very center of the U.S. housing market.

Delinquency Rate Trends (90+ Days) - Single Family Residential Mortgages

```mermaid graph TD subgraph Q3 2024 A[1.52%] end subgraph Q4 2024 B[1.60%] end subgraph Q1 2025 C[1.68%] end subgraph Q2 2025 D[1.75%] end subgraph Q3 2025 E[1.78%] end

A --> B --> C --> D --> E

```

3. The Capital Structure Battle: Preferreds vs. Commons

To understand the investment case for Fannie and Freddie, it's essential to understand their complex capital structure. This is not a simple case of "buy the stock and hope for the best." There are different classes of shares, each with its own unique risk and reward profile.

The Junior Preferreds (FNMAS/FMCKJ) are the preferred vehicle for many hedge funds and sophisticated investors. These shares sit higher up in the capital structure than the common stock, which means they have a priority claim on the company's assets in a restructuring. In any scenario where the GSEs are privatized, the preferred shares must be paid their par value ($25) before the common shareholders get a dime. Currently, these shares trade at a massive discount to their par value, often in the $5-10 range. This creates a compelling risk/reward proposition. If privatization happens, the preferreds could see a 3-5x return, with a much higher degree of certainty than the common stock.

The Common Stock (FNMA/FMCC) is the "lotto ticket." This is the investment that could see a 10x or even 20x return if everything goes perfectly. But the path to that return is fraught with peril. The biggest risk is the government's 79.9% warrant position in the companies. In a privatization scenario, the Treasury could exercise these warrants, flooding the market with new shares and diluting existing shareholders into oblivion. The "moonshot" scenario, the one that could send the common stock to the moon, is one where the warrants are cancelled. This is the outcome that the most ardent bulls are hoping for, but it's also the least likely. A more realistic scenario is one where the government takes its 79.9% stake, leaving the existing common shareholders with a much smaller piece of a much larger pie.

This is the central dilemma for investors. The preferreds offer a "safer" way to bet on privatization, with a more clearly defined upside and a higher place in the capital structure. The commons offer a much higher potential return, but also a much higher risk of dilution and a complete wipeout.

4. Valuation & Verdict

So, what are Fannie and Freddie actually worth? Let's run some hypothetical "exit math." If Fannie Mae earns $15 billion a year, and we apply a conservative 10x P/E multiple (in line with other large financial institutions), that would value the company at $150 billion. After the government takes its 79.9% cut, that would leave $30.15 billion for the remaining shareholders. With approximately 1.16 billion shares outstanding, that would translate to a stock price of around $26. But that's before accounting for the repayment of the preferred stock, which would further reduce the amount available to common shareholders.

A more realistic valuation, one that accounts for the repayment of the preferreds and a more conservative P/E multiple, might put the common stock in the $3-5 range. That's still a healthy return from the current price, but it's a far cry from the $10+ that the bulls are hoping for.

Privatization Scenario Modeling

So, what's the call?

Speculative Buy on the Preferreds: For investors who want to make a bet on the privatization of Fannie and Freddie, the junior preferreds offer the most attractive risk/reward profile. They have a priority claim on the company's assets, a clearly defined par value, and a significant upside potential if the conservatorship is ended. They are the "safer" gamble on privatization.

Avoid/Short the Common Stock: The common stock is a much more speculative bet. The risk of massive dilution from the government's warrant position is simply too high. And that's before we even consider the rising tide of credit defaults that could threaten the company's profitability. The common stock is a lotto ticket, and it's one that's more likely to end up worthless than to hit the jackpot.

In conclusion, the GSEs are a fascinating case study in the intersection of politics and finance. The potential for a political resolution to the conservatorship is real, but so are the fundamental risks of a housing downturn. For now, the smart money is on the preferreds, which offer a more prudent way to play the privatization theme. The common stock, on the other hand, is a gamble that's best left to the speculators.