Increased Revenue Per Household by 22% with Fee Restructuring
Executive Summary
Luminary Wealth Partners, a growing RIA managing over $350 million in assets, faced a challenge in maximizing revenue and accurately reflecting the comprehensive value they offered clients. Relying on a traditional, commission-based model, they realized it wasn't sustainable for long-term growth. Through the implementation of a value-based fee structure, guided by consultant Sophia Martinez, Luminary successfully shifted its revenue model, resulting in a 22% increase in average revenue per household within one year.
The Challenge
Luminary Wealth Partners recognized that its commission-based revenue model was hindering its ability to provide truly comprehensive financial planning services. While commissions adequately compensated for investment transactions, they didn't account for the time and expertise spent on retirement planning, estate planning, tax optimization, and other crucial aspects of wealth management.
Specifically, Luminary's revenue was disproportionately tied to trading activity. In 2022, approximately 60% of their revenue came from commissions on trades, while the remaining 40% was generated from AUM fees. This created a potential conflict of interest, incentivizing advisors to recommend transactions that might not always be in the client's best interest.
Furthermore, the commission-based structure led to inconsistencies in service delivery. Clients with similar investment portfolios but differing needs received varying levels of attention. A client with $500,000 in assets who rarely traded might receive less attention than a client with the same assets who actively traded, even if the former required more complex financial planning.
Another challenge was attracting and retaining high-net-worth clients. Many potential clients were hesitant to work with an advisor who primarily earned commissions, perceiving it as less transparent and potentially biased. This limited Luminary's ability to grow its AUM and expand its service offerings.
To quantify the problem, Luminary conducted an internal analysis and found that their average revenue per household was $8,500 in 2022. They aimed to increase this figure to at least $10,000 by the end of 2023, while simultaneously improving client satisfaction and reducing reliance on commission-based income. They also needed a better system to showcase the value of their advice beyond just investment returns.
The Approach
Sophia Martinez, a practice management consultant specializing in fee structure optimization, worked closely with Luminary Wealth Partners to design and implement a value-based fee model. The approach involved several key steps:
1. Needs Assessment and Discovery: Martinez conducted in-depth interviews with Luminary's advisors and staff to understand their current workflows, client demographics, and service offerings. She also analyzed the firm's financial data to identify revenue streams, expenses, and profitability margins.
2. Value Proposition Definition: Together, Martinez and Luminary defined the core value proposition that the firm offered to its clients. This involved identifying the key services that clients valued most, such as financial planning, investment management, retirement planning, estate planning, and tax optimization. They defined levels of service from basic financial checkups to full comprehensive plans.
3. Fee Structure Design: Based on the value proposition, Martinez developed a tiered fee structure that aligned fees with the scope and complexity of services provided. The new fee structure included:
- Financial Planning Fee: A fixed annual fee for comprehensive financial planning services, covering retirement planning, estate planning, insurance analysis, and tax optimization. The fees ranged from $2,500 to $10,000 per year, depending on the complexity of the client's financial situation.
- Asset Management Fee: A percentage-based fee on assets under management (AUM), covering investment strategy, portfolio management, and ongoing monitoring. The fee structure was tiered, with lower percentages for larger AUM balances. For example, 1% on the first $1 million, 0.75% on the next $2 million, and 0.5% on assets above $3 million.
4. Client Communication and Education: A critical component of the transition was effectively communicating the value proposition of the new fee structure to clients. Martinez helped Luminary develop clear and concise communication materials, including brochures, website content, and client presentations. Advisors were trained on how to explain the benefits of the new model and address any client concerns.
5. Implementation and Monitoring: The new fee structure was phased in over a six-month period, allowing existing clients to transition gradually. Luminary closely monitored the impact of the changes on revenue, client satisfaction, and advisor workload. Martinez provided ongoing support and guidance throughout the implementation process.
The strategic thinking revolved around shifting the focus from product sales (commissions) to delivering holistic financial advice. This involved educating clients on the value of comprehensive planning and demonstrating how the new fee structure aligned Luminary's interests with their own. The decision framework involved analyzing client needs, benchmarking against industry standards, and projecting the financial impact of different fee scenarios.
Technical Implementation
The implementation involved several technical aspects:
- Financial Planning Software: Luminary utilized eMoney Advisor to model different financial scenarios and project the impact of the new fee structure on client outcomes. This allowed them to demonstrate the value of comprehensive financial planning to clients and justify the new fees.
- CRM Integration: The firm integrated their CRM system (Salesforce) with their billing software (Bill.com) to automate the fee calculation and billing process. This reduced administrative overhead and improved accuracy.
- Fee Analyzer Tool: Martinez developed a custom fee analyzer tool in Excel that allowed advisors to quickly compare the old commission-based fees with the new value-based fees for individual clients. This helped advisors demonstrate the fairness and transparency of the new model.
- Data Migration: The transition required migrating client data from the old commission-based system to the new fee-based system. This involved cleaning and validating the data to ensure accuracy and consistency.
- Compliance Review: The new fee structure was reviewed by a compliance consultant to ensure it met all regulatory requirements and fiduciary standards. All client communications were also vetted to ensure they were accurate and compliant.
- Benchmarking: Luminary used industry reports from firms like Cerulli Associates and InvestmentNews to benchmark their fees against those of other RIAs. This helped them ensure that their fees were competitive and reasonable.
- Value Added Metrics: In addition to AUM and investment returns, Luminary began tracking new metrics to quantify the value of their advice. These included:
- Tax savings achieved for clients.
- Insurance cost reductions negotiated.
- Improvements to retirement plan projections.
- Estate planning efficiencies created.
Results & ROI
The implementation of the value-based fee structure yielded significant results for Luminary Wealth Partners:
- Increased Revenue per Household: Average revenue per household increased from $8,500 in 2022 to $10,370 in 2023, a 22% increase.
- Shift in Revenue Composition: Commission-based revenue decreased from 60% of total revenue in 2022 to 35% in 2023. Asset management and financial planning fees now constitute the majority of revenue.
- Improved Client Satisfaction: Client satisfaction scores, measured through annual surveys, increased by 15%, indicating that clients were more satisfied with the value they were receiving. Specifically, net promoter scores went from 65 to 80.
- Increased AUM: Assets under management increased by 18% in 2023, driven by both market appreciation and net new client acquisitions. AUM went from $350 Million to $413 Million.
- Reduced Advisor Workload: Automation of billing and reporting processes freed up advisors to spend more time with clients and focus on financial planning.
- Higher Profitability: Overall profitability increased by 12% due to the more predictable and recurring revenue stream.
The ROI was clear: a more stable and sustainable revenue model, happier clients, and a more profitable business. The financial planning fee especially increased profitability, because many of those costs were not directly associated with AUM fluctuations.
Key Takeaways
- Align Fees with Value: Transitioning to a value-based fee structure allows you to charge clients for the full range of services you provide, not just investment management.
- Communicate Value Clearly: Clearly articulate the value proposition of your services to clients and explain how the new fee structure benefits them.
- Invest in Technology: Automate your billing and reporting processes to reduce administrative overhead and improve efficiency.
- Monitor and Adjust: Continuously monitor the impact of the new fee structure and make adjustments as needed to optimize revenue and client satisfaction.
- Educate Your Team: Provide thorough training to your advisors and staff on the new fee structure and how to effectively communicate it to clients. This is best acheived with a written, practiced script.
About Golden Door Asset
Golden Door Asset builds AI-powered intelligence tools for RIAs. Our platform helps advisors identify client needs, personalize financial plans, and automate compliance tasks, increasing AUM and improving client retention. Visit our tools to see how we can help your practice.
